When Prasoon sir [Joshi, co-writer] and team suggested that I helm Manikarnika after the director [Krish] left the project, my initial request was to get another director. They had three names for me to pick from, but somehow, the task on hand was so humungous, nobody would stay. Honestly, they were taken on only for the physical work — the recces, meetings, etc — because I thought I would do the mental work of a director.
But the directors ran away! Since the writers continued to send the material to me, eventually, I had no choice but to [dive] into directing the film. The idea of putting out a film that didn't live up to its name scared me. The reworking [of the period drama] was crucial to how it eventually looked on screen. After the studio saw the [initial cut by Krish], there was a good chance that this movie wouldn't have seen the light of day. There were discrepancies in the plotline.
Krish was caught up with another film, and we couldn't delay our project. Directing it wasn't difficult. Vijayendra sir [KV Vijayendra Prasad, writer] had written an impactful script; Kiran sir [Deohans] set up the shots beautifully and all I had to do was go by the written word. When male actors take the onus of their films, do they demand credit? Then why is it made to look like I hijacked a project? I did what's in the best interest of a film that rode on my shoulders. This wasn't about seeing my name as director.
Catch up on all the latest entertainment news and gossip here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates
from Latest news in Mumbai,National news,Mumbai news,Mid-Day epaper,Mid-Day online news paper | Mid-Day https://ift.tt/2rO8y58
https://ift.tt/eA8V8J https://ift.tt/1L8zhvV
0 Comments